Legal Opinion
Feist v. Roesler
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 2, 1935No. 8114PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLAIR, Justice.
The parties will be designated as in the trial court. Plaintiffs Fred C. Feist, H. Teplicek, and H. E. Droll sued the defendant C. R. Roesler for damages for breach of an alleged written contract to sell certain real estate situated in Runnels county, Tex. The written contract was alleged to have consisted of two letters; the first written by defendant to Feist reads as follows :
“New Braunfels; Texas,
“Rte 4, 1108 W. Coll St.,
“Feb. 16th, 1929.
“Mr. Fred Feist, Rowena, Texas.
“Dear Friend: In regards your telephone conversation will answer more plain. The lots are 10 lots or about…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wintz v. MorrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1856
- Long v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Morris v. McGoughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Elliott v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nevada National Bank v. Gold Star Meat CompanyNevada Supreme Court · 1973
- Harold J. Boggan v. Data Systems Network Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Patterson v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Playland Park Stadium Corp. v. SpectorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Boggan v. Data Systems Network Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992