Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Sears, Roebuck and Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 23, 2004No. 1030572PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, Roebuck and Co. ("Sears"), the defendant in an action pending in the Jefferson Circuit Court, petitions for a writ of mandamus directing Judge Dan C. King III to set aside his order denying its motion to dismiss. For the reasons discussed below, we deny the petition.

I. Facts and Procedural History

On February 14, 2003, a house fire occurred at the house of John and Shirley Devise. The Devises believed that a Kenmore brand dishwasher purchased from Sears and installed by an individual hired by Sears started the fire. They sued, among others, Sears, Kenmore, Inc., and Neb Bibb, the Sears…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hensgens v. Deere & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  2. Agnes E. NILSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the CITY OF MOSS POINT, MISSISSIPPI, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. Wesch v. FolsomCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Ex Parte Ben-Acadia, Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Phillip J. McNellis as Trustee of Donald S. Potter, Bankrupt v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Rochester, New York,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte VanceSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Stewart v. BrinleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  3. Sanders v. Alabama Department of Mental Health & Mental RetardationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  4. Elliott v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  5. Ex Parte LCS Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API