Legal Opinion
U.S. Steel Group v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 25, 1998No. Consolidated Court No. 95-09-01144PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Pogue, Judge:
On July 14,1997, this Court remanded certain aspects of the International Trade Administration’s final determination in Oil Country Tubular Goods from Argentina, 60 Fed. Reg. 33,539 (Dep’t Commerce 1995)(final det.) (“Final Determination”). U.S. Steel Group v. United States, 973 F. Supp. 1076 (CIT 1997)(“US. Steel").1
The remand Order directed Commerce to reconsider its treatment of miscellaneous income as an offset to respondent Siderca’s general and *105administrative costs (“G&A”) and the adjustment of Siderca’s cost of production (“COP”) to account for the reintegro tax…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pauley v. BethEnergy Mines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Floral Trade Council v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Asociacion Colombiana De Exportadores De Flores v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Maui Pineapple Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.