Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1978No. 9072PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Evelyn Smith appeals from a judgment of divorce contending the district court improperly divided marital assets, and awarded insufficient alimony and attorney’s fees. We disagree.

The Smiths were married in 1951. In 1955 respondent, Paul Smith, began work for the Ideal Supply Company, and shortly thereafter became general manager. In 1958, the owner of Ideal, Jack Kurtz, died, leaving 52% of the capital stock to his wife, and the balance to his two sons. One year later, Mrs. Kurtz died and bequeathed her stock to respondent in his name alone. The corporation thereafter retired the…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Van Camp v. Van CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Beam v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Fletcher v. FletcherNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Sargeant v. SargeantNevada Supreme Court · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Waldman v. MainiNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. SMITH (SOPHIA) v. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2026
  3. Draskovich v. DraskovichNevada Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Draskovich v. DraskovichNevada Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API