Legal Opinion

Pipa v. Kemberling

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 11, 1937No. Appeal, 17Published

1Opinion

When this case was here before, the Commonwealth was neither a party to the record nor represented at the argument. We then held, for the reasons stated in an opinion filed December 14, 1936, that the Attorney General in appointing, under the provisions of Section 907 of the Administrative Code of April 9, 1929, Article IX, P.L. 177, 239, 71 P. S. § 297,1 John L. Pipa, Jr., Esq., appellant herein, a special attorney to investigate criminal charges against certain persons and prosecute the alleged offenders in Snyder County, had power to fix the compensation of his appointee, but was without…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Minerd v. MargiottiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Commonwealth v. CurrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney General v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  5. Provident Life & Trust Co. v. KlemmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API