State v. Young
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WYNN, Judge.
Under North Carolina law, to prove aiding and abetting the State must- show, inter alia, that “the defendant knowingly advised, instigated, encouraged, procured, or aided the other person to commit that crime.” 1 Here, Defendant George Darnel Young argues the State failed to show he knowingly aided James Batiste in murdering Douglas Jamal Mangum. Because evidence in the record supports the conclusion that Defendant encouraged and aided James Batiste in murdering Douglas Mangum, we uphold his conviction.
At trial, the evidence (pertinent to supporting the jury’s verdict finding…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Wall v. StoutSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. RedfernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. DeBiaseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- State v. CruseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009