Higgins v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Tu Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Michigan. Frank I,. Higgins was convicted of a criminal offense, and brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
COCHRAN, District Judge.
The plaintiff in error complains of a judgment of the lower court sentencing him to be confined in the penitentiary for 1-1 months and to pay a fine of $1,118.08. He had been assistant postmaster at Sault Ste. Marie, Mich. The indictment under which the conviction was had consisted of three counts. The first one was under section 4053, U. S. Rev. Statutes (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2755), and charged him with willfully neglecting to deposit, as required by that section, $1,257.20 postal revenues of the United States in his temporary custody. The second count was under…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Crumpton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Felton v. SpiroCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- Chadwick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
- James v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Bernette Floyd JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Glenwood Irr. Co. v. ValleryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
- Carlisle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1912
- Sparks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
- Paine v. St. Paul Union Stockyards Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.