Legal Opinion

Sparks v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 8, 1917No. 2817PublishedCited by 19 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Tennessee; John E. McCaH, Judge. Samuel U. Sparks and others were convicted of offenses, and they bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.

The Chickasaw Banking & Trust Company was a banking corporation organized in 1905 under the laws of Tennessee and doing business at Memphis. On the 7th day of January, 1913, it closed its doors by reason of insolvency. Following the bank’s failure, plaintiffs in error and one Biles were indicted upon eight counts, seven of which charged the use of the mails to promote a scheme to defraud in violation of section 215 of the Penal Code of the United States. The remaining count charged a conspiracy, within section 37 of the Code (Comp. St. 1916, § 10201), to violate section…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dunlop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Crawford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Claassen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. People v. . FieldingNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Crumpton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. John B. Sanders, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  3. Pierce v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
  4. Bratcher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
  5. Deaver v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API