Nasca v. Hull
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
¶1 Dave Hull, Don Ovitt, and Bill Buckner, d/b/a Quality Used Cars of Hamilton (“Appellants” or “Quality”), appeal from the judgment entered by the Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Ravalli County, which dismissed Appellants’ third-party complaint against John Blayden and the Herndon Insurance Agency, Inc., an Idaho Corporation (“Respondents”). We reverse and remand.
¶2 We rephrase the issue on appeal as follows:
¶3 Did the District Court err in dismissing Quality’s complaint on grounds that the exercise of specific personal jurisdiction over Respondents would violate due process?
FACTUAL…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Stratemeyer v. Lincoln CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Cimmaron Corp. v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- Simmons Oil Corp. v. Holly Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1990
- Threlkeld v. ColoradoMontana Supreme Court · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tackett v. DuncanMontana Supreme Court · 2014
- Bunch v. Lancair International, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
- Gateway v. Philadelphia IndemnityMontana Supreme Court · 2020
- Bucy v. Edward Jones & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2019
- Weimar v. BarrettMontana Supreme Court · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.