Legal Opinion

Lusk v. Boise City

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1930No. 5451Published

1Opinion of the CourtMcNAUGHTON, J.

This is an action to declare illegal the special assessments and to enjoin the issuance of the special improvement bonds of Gutter Improvement District No. 1, of Boise City.

Judgment was for the city, dismissing the complaint.

The proceedings of the city council were attacked in the lower court, and by appropriate assignments are attacked here, principally upon the ground that the resolution declaring intention was introduced and passed on the day it was presented, as also was the ordinance creating the local improvement district, in violation of sec. 37 of the Charter, in that no emergency…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re Difference & Controversy between E. M. Derby & Co. & City of ModestoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. In Re East Bay Etc. Water Bonds of 1925California Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Martin v. City of OskaloosaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Caldwell v. Village of Mountain HomeIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
  5. King v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API