Legal Opinion
Xerox Corp. v. International Business Machines Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 2, 1977No. Nos. 70 Civ. 1596, 73 Civ. 3421, 76 Civ. 2345-DNEPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDELSTEIN, Chief Judge:
Xerox Corporation [hereinafter Xerox] has moved this court for an order pursuant to Rule 37(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [hereinafter Fed. R. Civ. P.] imposing sanctions against International Business -Machines Corporation [hereinafter IBM] for failure to comply with certain of this court’s orders entered earlier in these consolidated litigations. Specifically, Xerox alleges IBM’s failure to comply with court orders dated July 23, 1974, October 25,1974, June 9,1976, September 17, 1976, December 5, 1975, and March 7, 1972, and now seeks an order…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Mallinckrodt Chemical Works v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Xerox Corp. v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Patton v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1965
3Cited by2 opinions
- Culligan v. Yamaha Motor Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Goss v. CrossleyDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1980