Marshall v. Luiz
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Marin County, and from an order denying a new trial. E. M. Angellotti, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Britt, C.
By the terms of a written lease the plaintiffs in this action let to defendant Luiz for the term of one year, beginning September 1, 1894, a tract of farming and grazing land at the rental of two thousand eight hundred and eighty dollars, payable one-half on said September 1st, and the remainder on April 15, 1895. Among the covenants of the lease, for breach of which the lessors might re-enter, the lessee agreed that nothing should be sold from the land or removed therefrom except dairy products and calves and hogs raised on the place, “and that no hay, grain, or other product of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stockton Savings & Loan Society v. PurvisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Colville v. . MilesNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Hitchcock v. HassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- More v. OrdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by4 opinions
- D'Alessandro v. PickfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Farmers Banking & Trust Co. v. Tarboro Leaf Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Carstenbrook v. WedderienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- In Re PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909