Lasater v. Maher
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
John F. Maher, and wife, Lois Lasater Maher, sued for and obtained a decree permanently enjoining Garland M. Lasater from using a road across their ranch. Lasater appealed upon the grounds that his land is otherwise inaccessible and that he is entitled to an easement by implication and also by necessity. Maher and wife *482plead res judicata and that there is no necessity for the roadway.
The Maher lands and the Garland Las-ater lands were set over to them by a partition decree of the District Court of Brooks County in June, 1956. The partition decree adjudged that 9,345.69 acres of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stephenson v. Miller-Link Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Frazier v. Hanlon Gasoline Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Tompkins v. HookerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Zapata County v. LlanosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Hanrick v. HanrickTexas Supreme Court · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maher v. LasaterTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Claud Allen Hogue, Cross-Appellee v. Royse City, Texas, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Lasater v. MaherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Jimmie Luecke Children Partnership, Ltd. v. Elaine Pruncutz, John Pruncutz and Amy Peters, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2013