Legal Opinion
Boains v. Lasar Manufacturing Company
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 4, 1971No. Civ. 12944PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
Defendant Lasar Manufacturing Company, Inc. has moved for summary judgment in this diversity action on the ground that plaintiff’s claims are barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. The suit arises out of an injury which the plaintiff sustained in November 1968 while operating a meat-grinding machine manufactured and delivered by the defendant in 1953. Plaintiff’s complaint, filed in January 1969, sets out three separate causes of action: one sounding in strict tort liability; another in implied warranty;…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lydia Basko v. Sterling Drug, Inc., and Winthrop LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Collens v. New Canaan Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Rossignol v. Danbury School of Aeronautics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Vilcinskas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ogle v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Romano v. Westinghouse Electric Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1975
- Simmons v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1976
- City of Cincinnati, Ohio v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1986
- Drakatos v. R. B. Denison, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.