Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Mayor of Danville

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1937No. 24165. Judgment reversedPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company filed in the circuit court of Vermilion county a petition for mandamus against the mayor and the city commissioners of the city of Danville to compel the issuance to it of a license to sell malt beverages, at retail, at its store in Danville. The defendants moved to strike the petition. The parties entered into a stipulation of facts based upon the petition and the motion. The court awarded the writ of mandamus. It certified that the validity of a city ordinance is involved in the case and that the public interest requires that the cause, on appeal,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. City of Chicago v. NetcherIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. People Ex Rel. Franchere v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  4. People Ex Rel. Deitenbeck v. Village of Oak ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  5. People ex rel. Fitzgerald v. HarrisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Grand Union Co. v. SillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. Francis v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  3. Retail Liquor Dealers Protective Ass'n v. SchreiberIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Henson v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Plaza Recreational Center v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1961

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API