Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hames v. Cravens

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 9, 1998No. 97-687Published

1DissentDavid Newbern, Justice

Ben Robinson and Pat Hames, husband and wife, formed Partners In Rehab., Inc., with Marybeth Cravens. Mr. Robinson and Ms. Hames alleged that they agreed to invest in and work for the corporation in exchange for Ms. Cravens’s efforts to obtain contracts with the Riley Corporation and the Catlett Corporation. They further alleged that thereafter Ms. Cravens formed Rehab. Plus, Inc., and solicited the Riley Corporation and Catlett Corporation accounts for Rehab. Plus, Inc.

The complaint, filed in Pulaski Circuit Court, was dismissed solely on the ground that it stated a stockholder’s derivative…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Crosby v. BeamOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Thomas v. DicksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  4. Schumacher v. SchumacherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Clarence v. Watson v. Woodrow C. ButtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API