Legal Opinion

Rittenhouse v. Bell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 27, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court, Second Division; Guy Fulk, Judge;

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This suit was instituted in the Pulaski Circuit Court by the appellee Bell against appellant Rittenhouse. It was brought on the theory that Rittenhouse, as vice president of the Midland Land & Development Company, had undertaken to make a contract for the sale of certain lands, described in the complaint, amounting to about sixteen thousand acres; that Bell procured a purchaser upon the terms agreed, but when the purchaser was presented the Midland Land & Development Company refused to carry out the contract, which defendant had made on its behalf, and repudiated his authority to make same..

Th…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. PapeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Patterson v. RisherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  2. Morning Star Mining Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  3. Meier v. HartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  4. Ogletree v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. Swearingen v. BulgerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API