Legal Opinion

Shipes v. Hanover Insurance

District Court, M.D. Georgia

Decided September 30, 1987No. Civ. A. 87-69-3-MAC (WDO)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

OWENS, Chief Judge.

This action is before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. The issue, the proper calculation of benefits due an injured employee pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 33-34-8(c), is one that Georgia courts have not previously addressed. While the parties, plaintiff Ray Shipes and defendant Hanover Insurance Company, disagree as to the proper calculation of these benefits, they agree that the construction of the statute is a question of law and a matter properly determinable by this court. The nature of the dispute and counsel’s thorough briefing of the question negate any…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. Boston Old Colony InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Atlanta Casualty Co. v. SharptonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ray Shipes v. The Hanover Insurance Company, Ray Shipes v. Hanover Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Shipes v. Hanover InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API