Prudential Insurance Co. v. Foster
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This is an action to recover double indemnity on account of alleged accidental death. Ivan Prentice Foster, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, is assertedly entitled to the benefits payable under two policies of life insurance containing double indemnity prcwisions, issued by plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant or company, on the life of his father, Howard Arthur Foster.
The body of the insured was recovered from Lake Okmulgee, a few miles from the city of Okmulgee, Okla., on September 21, 1939. The defendant company paid the face amount of the policy to plaintiff…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- New York Life Insurance v. GamerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Stumpf v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Fipps v. StidhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- New York Life Insurance v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ruther v. TyraSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Gasko v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Rosier v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Cook v. BlackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States v. NealeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.