In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Hone
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Contestant bad the right to plead as many defenses as he desired, and the answer filed is a good pleading under section 49 of the Surrogate’s Court Act. After proponent makes out his prima facie case, the burden will rest upon contestant to prove fraud, misrepresentation and undue influence. (Matter of Kindberg, 207 N. Y. 220; Matter of Falabella, 139 N. Y. Supp. 1003.) The motion for leave to examine before trial should have been granted, to enable contestant to establish his defenses. The testimony sought is material and necessary. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 288; Brown v. Brown, 203 App. Div. 658;…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re the Probate of the Will of KindbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Lattimer v. Sun-Herald Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- In re Falabella's WillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1913
- Brown v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Estate of HeughesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of SchillingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- In re the Probate of the Will of DixonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
- In re the Estate of SmithNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- In re the Probate of the Will of BaumNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.