Legal Opinion
Hawkins v. Johanns
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided March 31, 2000No. 4:98CV3246PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KOPF, District Judge.
Are Nebraska voters, who reside in elementary-only school districts, denied equal protection of the laws because their school districts have less power than school districts that educate high school students or students from kindergarten through high school (K-12)? Similarly, are Nebraska voters, who reside in elementary-only school districts, denied equal protection of the laws because their school districts are controlled for some purposes by other school districts that educate high school students or K-12 students? Applying a “rational basis” level…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- San Carlos Apache Tribe v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
- Patrick C. English v. The Board of Education of the Town of Boonton William L. Librera, Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Education. Board of Education of Town of Boonton, the Board of Education of Lincoln Park, Intervenor. Patrick C. English v. The Board of Education of the Town of Boonton William L. Librera, Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Education. William L. Librera, the Board of Education of Lincoln Park, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- City of Tucson v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Nogueras Cartagena v. Maria CalderonDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2001
- English v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002