Legal Opinion

Yockey v. Salesforce, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 16, 2024No. 4:22-cv-09067Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PATRICK YOCKEY, et al., Case No. 22-cv-09067-JST 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 10 SALESFORCE, INC., Re: ECF No. 44 Defendant. 11 12 13 Before the Court is Defendant Salesforce, Inc.’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ second 14 amended complaint. ECF No. 44. The Court will deny the motion. 15 I. BACKGROUND 16 Salesforce offers a service called Chat that operates from Salesforce’s web servers but is 17 functionally implemented on Rite Aid’s and Kaiser Permanente’s websites, allowing Rite…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Mendiondo v. Centinela Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API