Legal Opinion

Abraham v. Union Pacific Railroad

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided August 23, 2007No. 14-06-00419-CVPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ADELE HEDGES, Chief Justice.

Appellants, 293 former and current employees of Union Pacific Railroad Company, 1 appeal a summary judgment in favor of Union Pacific. In a single issue, appellants argue that their medical causation evidence was sufficient to overcome appel-lee’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Appellants filed a toxic tort suit under the Federal Employers Liability Act (“FELA”) alleging that exposure to creosote used in the treatment of railroad ties caused appellants to suffer diseases of the throat, lungs, and skin including cancer. See 45 U.S.C. §§…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. McNeel v. Union Pacific R. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Mark McManaway v. KBR, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  3. Smart v. BNSF Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
  4. BNSF Railway Company v. Ronald Nichols, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
  5. Ragland v. BNSF Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API