Legal Opinion

Rhinebarger v. Mummert

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1977No. 2-975A240Published

1Opinion of the Court

362 N.E.2d 184 (1977)

Franklin RHINEBARGER and Bette Rhinebarger, Appellants,

v.

John H. MUMMERT, Appellee.

No. 2-975A240.

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Second District.

April 28, 1977.

Floyd F. Cook, Cook & Cook, Kokomo, for appellants.

Frank E. Tolbert, Miller, Tolbert, Hirschauer & Wildman, Logansport, for appellee.

WHITE, Judge.

The appellants (Rhinebargers) sued the appellee (Mummert) for damages for personal injuries to both, allegedly the result of an automobile collision. A jury found for Mummert. Rhinebargers argue that the trial court erred in giving a seat belt instruction, and that the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Spier v. BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Bentzler v. BraunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Kavanagh v. ButoracIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Mount v. McClellanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API