Legal Opinion

La Salle National Bank v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Decided June 18, 1991No. 88-CC-1180PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Patchett, J.

This cause coming on to be heard on the motion of the parties for entry of an award and for dismissal of this matter, due notice having been given the parties hereto, and the Court being fully advised in the premises.

The Court finds that:

In relevant part, the motion at bar reads as follows:

“1. This matter is a claim arising out of a contract for the rental of real property and is brought pursuant to Section 8(b) of the Court of Claims Act. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 37, par. 439.8(b).)

2. That on or about May 10, 1984, the Claimant and Respondent entered into a lease whereby…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ude, Inc. v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1982
  2. Loewenberg/Fitch Partnership v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1986
  3. J. F. Inc. v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1988
  4. Bojko v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Graham, O'Shea & Hyde v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1992
  2. DRF Realty, Inc. v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1993
  3. Fencel Construction Co. v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1991
  4. Lincoln Square Partnership v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API