Legal Opinion

Inskeep v. Inskeep

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1988No. 87-224PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Justice.

In the course of divorce proceedings, appellant served discovery requests upon ap-pellee. Appellee did not respond. On the eve of the divorce hearing, appellant filed a motion to compel discovery and a motion for continuance. The motions were denied, and appellee was granted a divorce with attendant property settlement and child custody and support provisions. Upon appeal, appellant presents two issues: (1) whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying appellant’s motion to compel discovery; and (2) whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Mauch v. Stanley Structures, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Carlson v. BMW Industrial Service, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Shanor v. Engineering, Inc. of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Tomash v. EvansWyoming Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hinckley v. HinckleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Byrd v. MahaffeyWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Johnson v. CliffordWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Janet G. Peterson v. Meritain Health, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Bb v. RsrWyoming Supreme Court · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API