Legal Opinion
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 23, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 91-7260PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
This non-jury matter arises out of a suit by Plaintiff Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) seeking a preliminary injunction and declaratory relief preventing a threatened strike by the defendant Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees on Conrail. The Plaintiff has brought suit under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 151 et *362seq. Defendants have filed a counterclaim seeking a preliminary injunction and declaratory relief preventing the Plaintiff from continuing to implement changes to the Railroad Employees National Health & Welfare…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. Delaware Audubon Society v. Texaco Refining and Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way EmployeesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994