Legal Opinion
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 28, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-4772PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
In this action for injunctive and declaratory relief, plaintiff Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) seeks a permanent injunction preventing a threatened strike by the defendant Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees (“BMWE” or “the Union”). Plaintiff also seeks a declaration by this court that, under the provisions of the Railway Labor Act (“RLA”), 45 U.S.C. § 151, et seq., the defendant is prohibited from striking over issues that are “minor disputes”, which are subject to the compulsory requirements created by Section 3 of the RLA,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way EmployesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2001
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine DivisionDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. United Transportation Union General Committee of AdjustmentDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- INTERN. UNION v. TextronDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1996