Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Peterman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1941No. 9546Published

1DissentHaney, Circuit Judge

I think no loss occurred until the time for redemption had expired. Commissioner v. Hawkins, 5 Cir., 91 F.2d 354; Nickoll v. Commissioner, 7 Cir., 103 F.2d 619, 621. Such a situation seems to me to be analogous to the case where a judgment is entered, but the time within which an appeal might be taken has not expired. See H. Liebes & Co. v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 90 F.2d 932, 938. In my opinion the loss herein claimed did not occur in the year 1936, and was therefore improperly claimed in the return for that year. The petition herein should be granted and the decision of the Board of Tax…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. H. Liebes & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  3. Nickoll v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API