United States v. Scarboro
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
JACKSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the government’s Motion to Direct Payment. The Defendant argues that the Court lacks jurisdiction and a necessary party is not joined. For the reasons given below, the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED and the Motion to Direct Payment is GRANTED.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The Defendant, Michael E. Scarboro, was charged by criminal Information on October 9, 2002 with Health Care Fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1347. Defendant was the director and vice-president of a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. TimiltyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Lyndonville Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. LussierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Koch Industries, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1992
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Michael MaysCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. YieldingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Vitullo v. ManciniDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- INTIMATECO, LLC v. APPAREL DISTRIBUTION INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- INTIMATECO, LLC v. APPAREL DISTRIBUTION INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.