Legal Opinion

Sellwood v. Phillips

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 30, 1936No. 34098PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

This is a proceeding in which certain co-owners of real estate are seeking a partition in kind of the property. All of the defendants except one agreed to the partition. The remaining defendant, in his answer, denied that the plaintiffs had legal title to the property, averring that’ a certain compromise agreement, through which they acquired title, was not valid because of errors of law and fact and lesion beyond moiety. He also denied that the property was susceptible of division in kind, being valuable oil land.

During the trial of the case on the merits, defendant urged…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. Hackley, Hume & JoyceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  2. Gulf Refining Co. v. HayneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  3. Brenard Manufacturing Co. v. GibbsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Massey v. W. R. Pickering Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  5. Williamson v. AmiltonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. ReeseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  2. Breard v. Pyramid Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  3. Benson v. Metropolitan Cas. Ins. Co. of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Misuraca v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  5. Rickerfor v. Westchester Fire Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API