Legal Opinion

(PC) Howard v. Rodriguez

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 3, 2024No. 1:24-cv-00285Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KARLIS RUBEN AUGUSTUS No. 1:24-cv-00285-SAB (PC) HOWARD, 12 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO Plaintiff, RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE 13 TO THIS ACTION v. 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AYLANA OLIVIA PARKS, et al., RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF 15 CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS Defendants. 16 (ECF No. 12) 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s third amended complaint, filed June 20, 2024. 21…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API