Legal Opinion

Jones v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided December 16, 1993No. 13-93-258-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEERDEN, Chief Justice.

This is an interlocutory appeal from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus. By a single point of error, the appellant, Elizabeth Jones, contends that the trial court erred in denying her writ based on the issue of double jeopardy. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

Following a minor two-car traffic accident, appellant Jones was issued a citation for following too closely. She was found guilty in municipal court and assessed a fine of one hundred dollars. Appellant now stands charged by Information with the misdemean- or offense of driving while…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Rice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Flores v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
  2. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API