Legal Opinion
DiDonato v. Derwinski
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided December 23, 1991No. Nos. 91-1033, 91-697PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
These cases were consolidated by order of the Court issued on November 4, 1991, for purposes of disposition of the Secretary’s motion to dismiss in each case based on lack of jurisdiction. In the case of appellant DiDonato, the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) issued a decision dated December 7, 1990. On August 19, 1991, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs submitted a motion to dismiss this appeal as untimely filed. On September 13, 1991, the Court ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant’s response, filed on October 15,…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lyle H. Prenzler v. Edward J. Derwinski, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Skinner v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Elsevier v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- John Mapu, Jr. Claimant-Appellant v. R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Rios v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Rios-Collins v. NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- Fletcher v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- Holliday v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.