Legal Opinion

Gayle v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 15, 1914PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of the city of Suffolk.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

The plaintiffs in error, who were retail grocers in Suffolk, were fined $50 each by the mayor of that city for the alleged violation of section 14 of an act approved March 12, 1908, commonly known as the “Byrd Liquor Law” (3 Ya. Code, p. 766), which forbids the sale of cider containing more than six per cent, of alcohol in local option territory and where no license to sell ardent spirits by retail has been granted. Upon appeal to the circuit court, the judgment of the Mayor was affirmed, which judgment we are asked to review.

Over the objection of the accused, the fact that the cider sold by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  2. Gates & Son Co. v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  3. Harris v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1885
  4. Street v. BroaddusSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Klarfeld v. SalsburySupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  2. Bare v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  3. Board of Supervisors v. Commonwealth ex rel. City of PetersburgSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
  4. Watkins v. FordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  5. Commonwealth v. DossSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API