Uitts v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
HUYETT, District Judge.
The present case is a products liability action arising out of an automobile accident. Plaintiffs have filed a motion to compel discovery seeking to obtain certain information concerning an engine mount recall campaign conducted by General Motors relating to certain vehicles manufactured by defendant.1 This information, plaintiffs allege, is necessary for preparation of their case. Defendant opposes the discovery as being irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of other admissible evidence. For the reasons stated below we deny…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Prashker v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Uitts v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gaylon Hofer v. Mack Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- In Re Richardson-Merrell, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
- Fine v. Facet Aerospace Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Bowman v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Kramer v. Boeing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.