Bracken v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIAN, Judge.
The offense is possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; the punishment confinement in the penitentiary for one year.
It was charged in the indictment that the liquor in question was spirituous. The proof showed that said liquor was what is commonly known as “home brew.” No effort was made to show that “home brew” was a spirituous liquor. Having seen fit to charge in its indictment that appellant possessed a spirituous liquor, it was incumbent upon the state to support said allegation by proof. In Chaves v. State, 275 S. W. 1006, it was averred that the liquor…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Allred v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Chaves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Commonwealth v. GreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1854
- Lloyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Buchannan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930