Huffman v. General Motors Corp.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ADAMS, Presiding Judge:
Claimant Lowell A. Huffman asks us to vacate an order of a three-judge panel of the Workers’ Compensation Court. Huffman claims he suffers from permanent partial disability to his respiratory system and lungs as a result of exposure to silicon bronze spray while employed by General Motors Corporation (Employer).
At trial, Employer stipulated Claimant’s injuries were job-related but denied permanent disability. Claimant offered a medical report from Dr. M in support of his claim at trial. Dr. M’s report concluded Huffman’s spirometric test results were…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Orrell v. BF GoodrichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Western States Construction Company v. StaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wilcoxson v. WOODWARD COUNTY EMSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- Davis v. Medical Arts LaboratoryCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
- UROLOGY CENTER OF SOUTH. OKLAHOMA v. MillerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- Owings v. Pool Well ServiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Owings v. Pool Well ServiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.