Legal Opinion

Huffman v. General Motors Corp.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 19, 1991No. 74964PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ADAMS, Presiding Judge:

Claimant Lowell A. Huffman asks us to vacate an order of a three-judge panel of the Workers’ Compensation Court. Huffman claims he suffers from permanent partial disability to his respiratory system and lungs as a result of exposure to silicon bronze spray while employed by General Motors Corporation (Employer).

At trial, Employer stipulated Claimant’s injuries were job-related but denied permanent disability. Claimant offered a medical report from Dr. M in support of his claim at trial. Dr. M’s report concluded Huffman’s spirometric test results were…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Orrell v. BF GoodrichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. Western States Construction Company v. StaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilcoxson v. WOODWARD COUNTY EMSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
  2. Davis v. Medical Arts LaboratoryCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. UROLOGY CENTER OF SOUTH. OKLAHOMA v. MillerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
  4. Owings v. Pool Well ServiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Owings v. Pool Well ServiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API