Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Hitaffer

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 6, 1970No. [No. 236, September Term, 1969.]PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Here we have an attempt to recover on behalf of a nine-year-old boy who lost the sight of one eye as a result of the explosion of a .22 caliber blank cartridge. The brief filed on his behalf says that he and other boys threw rocks at the cartridges and when this “child’s explosive would not go off he took it near his home and hit it with a hammer. It then went off * * Suit was brought on behalf of the boy, Herbert D. Hicks (Herbert), by his parents. The father also sued in his own right. They appear here as appellants. Defendants and appellees here are the landowner, The Baltimore and Ohio…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Benson v. Baltimore Traction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
  2. Peregoy v. Western Maryland RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  3. Carroll v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  4. Jackson v. Pennsylvania RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  5. Steinwedel v. HilbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Harrison v. Montgomery County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Casper v. Charles F. Smith & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. Sherman v. Suburban Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. B. P. Oil Corp. v. MabeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API