Legal Opinion

Haren & Laughlin Construction Co. v. Jayhawk Fire Sprinkler Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 25, 2011No. WD 72333PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS H. NEWTON, Presiding Judge.

Harén & Laughlin Construction Company, Inc. (H & L) appeals a summary judgment in favor of Jayhawk Fire Sprinkler Co., Inc. (Jayhawk). H & L, through its insurance company, paid for damages to a facility caused by a sprinkler system that Jayhawk, its subcontractor, had installed. H & L sued Jayhawk for remuneration under several theories including indemnity. Jayhawk claimed that it did not have to remunerate H & L because under then-contract, Jayhawk did not have to pay for damages covered by H & L’s insurance policy. Both parties moved for summary judgment.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Peters v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. Butler v. Mitchell-Hugeback, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  4. Nodaway Valley Bank v. E.L. Crawford Construction, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford v. United H.R.B. General Contractors, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. RLI Insurance Co. v. Southern Union Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Lithko Contracting v. XL Insurance Amer.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  3. Central Bank of the Midwest v. Nueterra Capital, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023
  4. Tokio Marine American Insurance Company v. Professional Service Industries, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API