Legal Opinion
S.M. Pires v. Frota Oceanica Brasileira, S.A.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 1, 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. Greenfield, J.), entered June 11, 1987, which denied defendants-appellants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion granted and the first, second and fourth causes of action in the amended complaint dismissed, without costs.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. Greenfield, J.), entered October 21, 1988, upon a special jury verdict in favor of plaintiff S.M. Pires, solely on his cause of action for maintenance and cure against defendant Frota Oceánica Brasileira,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Farrell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Hellenic Lines Ltd. v. RhoditisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Wheeler v. West India S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
3Cited by6 opinions
- Paris v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Militello v. Ann & Grace, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- DiIorio v. Gibson & Cushman of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Pires v. Frota Oceanica Brasileira, S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Pires v. Frota Oceanica Brasileira, S. A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.