Legal Opinion

United States v. One Packard Sedan

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided September 7, 1926No. 2464PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALL, District Judge.

This cause comes on for hearing upon the libel for forfeiture filed by the government, the claim interposed by the Packard Palm Beach Company, answer, the testimony taken, and stipulation filed by proctors of the respective parties.

The libel alleges two grounds for forfeiture: First, the violation of section 593b of the Tariff Act of 1922 (Comp. St. § 5841hl3), under sections 3061 and 3062 of the Revised Statutes (Comp. St. §§ 5763, 5764); second, under the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. § 10138)4 et seq.). This *875last ground was abandoned by tbe proctor for tbe…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. SedanDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1928
  2. The Evelyn RuthDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1930
  3. United States v. One Chevrolet CoachDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1932
  4. Kennedy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  5. The Hammitt L. RobbinsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API