Legal Opinion
Seeley v. Cincinnati Shaper Co., Ltd.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 5, 1992PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
256 N.J. Super. 1 (1992)
606 A.2d 378
JOHN SCOTT SEELEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CINCINNATI SHAPER COMPANY, LTD., CINCINNATI, INC. (FORMERLY CINCINNATI SHAPER CO. OF CINCINNATI, OHIO), DAVID SCHWARTZ COMPANY, AND FAB SALES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND RUTHERFORD COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 18, 1991.
Decided February 14, 1992.
Reconsidered April 8, 1992.
Decided May 5, 1992.
Before Judges KING, DREIER and BROCHIN.
James D. Martin argued the cause for appellant Cincinnati Shaper Co., Ltd. (Lynch, Martin & Philibosian, attorneys; Kenneth…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Michalko v. Cooke Color & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Brown v. United States Stove Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Tirrell v. Navistar Intern., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Soler v. Castmaster, Div. of HPM Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Coffman v. Keene Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Lewis v. American Cyanamid Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Fabian v. Minster MacH. Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- MacRie v. SDS Biotech Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Koruba v. American Honda Motor Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.