Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. Gerlach
District Court, D. South Dakota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON PARTIES’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DOCS. 78 & 115
Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge
Pending before the .Court is the- Flan-dreau Santee Sioux Tribe’s (“the Tribe”) Motion for Summary Judgment on Claims for Relief One, Three, and Four of the-First Amended Complaint. Doc. 115. In its motion, the Tribe asserts that the State of South Dakota’s (“the State”) imposition of a state use tax on nonmeuiber purchases of goods and services throughout the Royal River enterprise is unlawful under the Indian Gaming Regulation Act (“IGRA”) and interferes with…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Forest Cnty. Potawatomi Cmty. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Everi Payments Inc., V Wa State Dept Of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. SattgastUnited States District Court · 2018
- Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. TerwilligerDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2018
- Forest County Potawatomi Community v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018