Legal Opinion
Fetterly v. Paskett
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided August 1, 1990No. Civ. 89-1106PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
CALLISTER, Senior District Judge.
The Court has before it petitioner’s habe-as corpus death penalty action. The Court heard it’s second series of oral arguments concerning factual and legal issues on July 10, 1990, has reviewed the entire matter and is prepared to submit its written findings.
The Court has cited the facts of this case in two previous and exhaustive memorandum decisions and will not repeat those recitations here. Instead the Court will simply summarize and give a brief description of the facts before turning to the underlying issues. The petitioner, Donald…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Godfrey v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Donald Kenneth Fetterly v. David Paskett, Warden, Idaho State Prisons and Jim Jones, Attorney General of the State of IdahoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Fetterly v. PaskettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Dennis Rosa Collazo v. Wayne Estelle, Warden, California Mens ColonyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 13, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 37 Donald Kenneth Fetterly v. Dave Paskett, Warden, Idaho State Prison and Alan G. Lance, Attorney General of the State of IdahoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Dennis Rosa Collazo v. Wayne Estelle, Warden, California Mens ColonyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.