Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dennis Rosa Collazo v. Wayne Estelle, Warden, California Mens Colony

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 18, 1991No. 19-72219Published

1DissentO’Scannlain, Circuit Judge

To paraphrase the great Bard of Avon, “[t]he [majority] doth protest too much, methinks.” W. Shakespeare, Hamlet, III, ii. In a noble attempt to vindicate important legal principles, my colleagues have misinterpreted and exaggerated the essential and dispositive facts of this case. More importantly, they have unjustifiably expanded the prophylactic rules that govern the waiver of an accused’s constitutional rights to legal assistance and against self-incrimination. I therefore respectfully dissent.

I

A

In Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981), the Supreme Court…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API