Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. Hubert
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
This is an action on a policy of liability insurance by the insured, against whom plaintiff claims that a liability was fixed by the judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. Plaintiff paid the judgment and seeks to be reimbursed for so doing.
Appellant insists that count 1, which is the only count on which the case was tried (count 2 was withdrawn), does not sufficiently show the terms of the policy, or the period of its duration, and that jts averment that the policy was in full force and effect is the conclusion, of the pleader, as declared in National Life & Accident…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- George v. Employers' Liability Assur. CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Rosenbaum v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Sovereign Camp W. O. W. v. GunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Whitsett v. BelueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. DorrietySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY INC. v. HareCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- American Bankers' Ins. Co. v. DeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933