Legal Opinion

In re Rerat

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 24, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLYNEAUX, District Judge.

This matter comes up on an order to show cause, obtained by the bankrupt herein, requiring the Falls Rubber Company, the Fisk Tire Company, Inc., and the Michelin Tire Company, to show cause why an order made by this court on the 3d day of February, 1926, should not be set aside and vacated, and all appearances, specifications, and proceedings had on account of said order be stricken from the records.

The previous order referred to was entered on the 3d day of February, 1926, on the application and showing made by the three creditors above referred to, and read as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re LevinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1910
  2. In re GinsburgDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. In re GrantDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re MecklerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1957
  2. In re D. H. Stiebel & SonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  3. Lerner v. First Wisconsin Nat. Bank of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API