In re D. H. Stiebel & Sons
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HICKENLOOPEB, Circuit Judge.
At the time set for hearing appellants’ petition for discharge in bankruptcy, the' trustee appeared by counsel and entered his appearance as objecting. Specifications in opposition were duly filed within the following ten days. General Order XXXII. It subsequently developed that the trustee had not been properly authorized to resist the discharge at a meeting of the creditors called for such purpose. Section 14b of the Bankruptcy Act (11 USCA § 32(b). The only question for decision here is whether, in such event, the District Court is justified in permitting other…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Freshman v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- In re BrecherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- In re LevinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1910
- Rerat v. Fisk Tire, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Schlicht v. De GrootCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.