Baizley v. Welsh
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On application for a rule to show cause why a new trial should not he granted.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fort, J.
In this case the rule is refused. The proof in the ease shows that defendant admitted at the trial that he was indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $795, represented' largely by promissory notes which the plaintiff held.
The defence was a set-off; the defendant claimed that he had furnished to the plaintiff, through one Bowden, as his agent, large quantities of merchandise, mentioned in an itemized account annexed to his plea. Bowden admitted the receipt of the goods, but alleged that he had purchased the same individually and not as the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Kavanaugh v. QuigleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Cronberg Bros. v. JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
- Duffy v. McKennaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
- Smith v. WickardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908